The Reebok ZPrint Train and Run shoes are a problem solver. These days, the latest running and training shoes are so expensive. If you want to support a “brick and mortar” store and buy your shoes locally, what options do you have?
The team at Reebok is definitely trying to help. Recently they have offered numerous shoes under the $100 price point. Their latest offerings are the ZPrint Train and Run shoes. These shoes provide a customized fit that comes with their advanced 3D foot scan engineered cushioning. Reebok is promoting these shoes as the latest in their line of flex groove technology footwear. If you’re seeking a light weight, comfortable and affordable shoe, then you should consider the ZPrint. I recently picked up a pair of the “Train” models, at a very affordable $79.98. I put them through a week of training and wanted to share my observations.
I found the ZPrint to be a really comfortable shoe with a mesh upper for better breathability and a lightweight, but cushioned fit that molded to my foot, unlike my Asics stability shoes (which I really like and have helped me remain injury free for the last 3+ years). These shoes fit like a nice comfortable glove.
Visit our online REEBOK STORE for discounts and special offers on many REEBOK products
Lightweight at approximately 9 oz, 2 oz less than my Asics.
The ZPrint is made for the road or track. It provides traction on hard and even surfaces. I wouldn’t recommend this for trails or gravel because of it’s lack of stability. Reebok ZPrint is probably average as far it’s durability. Its upper uses Reebok’s NanoWeb technology, which offers long lasting support. I think the mesh will be resilient enugh to ensure fit after at least 2-300 hundred miles. Unless you’re a neutral runner, who doesn’t need much stability, I wouldn’t recommend these shoes for long runs. Instead, I found they were best for my cross-fit workouts. Which will ultimately save me the wear and tear on my long distance trainers.
The ZPrint also suitable for speed workouts because of its lightweight and flexible platform. However, because of my need for a more stable shoe with heel support, if I were to use this shoe to take advantage it’s lightweight benefits, I would need to land more on my forefoot in order to prevent injury. I wouldn’t recommend this shoe for racing, unless you’re a neutral runner. Overall, I intend to mostly use ZPrints for cross training and casual purposes. If you’re going to wear these shoes for training runs (5-6 miles), my recommendation is to alternate the ZPrint with other more stable shoes. This way you will still get a lot of use out of them and your other trainers will last longer.
Pros: Price, weight and comfort are excellent. The ZPrint is a perfect CrossFit shoe. It’s also an excellent casual shoe.
Cons: I’m concerned about the shoe’s lack of stability for runners like myself that pronate and require a stable heel cup.
How to Find Out More and Get Your Own Pair of Reebok ZPrint Train or Run
You can learn more about the Reebok ZPrint shoes at Reebok.com. They comes in sizes and styles for men, women, boys, and girls. These shoes are available at Dick’s Sporting Goods, Foot Locker, Famous Footwear and some specialty running shoe stores. You can follow this link to find other Reebok store locations.
Worn-out or ill-fitting shoes are a leading cause of injury with runners. Wear and tear in older running shoes is not always apparent to the naked eye. If you want to stay healthy, fit, and injury-free, it’s an absolute must to invest in a good pair of running shoes. This article will walk you through a basic process to find and purchase a good pair of new running shoes.
Don’t skimp on your running shoe purchase. You may not want your kids to spend $150+ on basketball shoes or fancy sneakers, but I urge you not to worry about the cost of a good pair of running shoes that are comfortable and fit. Even if you have to spend $150 or more (which is not always the case), it will be an investment in your good health that’s worth it. I can assure you that the cost of good running shoes is much less than the money and time spent seeing a doctor due to injury.
See the experts at your local specialty running shop where the staff members are experienced and knowledgeable about fitting beginner and advanced runners of all different body sizes and various running styles. Don’t go to a big-box sporting good store or department store. I have spent thousands of dollars over the years, purchasing running shoes and accessories for myself and my family. Your local running store can help you successfully navigate the running shoe purchase process. The sales people at specialty stores are knowledgeable about all the latest brands and running shoe styles. You should think of them as consultants. When you buy running shoes from a local specialty store, you not only help yourself, but you are helping to support an integral part of the community. These companies typically sponsor local running races and fitness events. They also sponsor or coordinate training groups to ready runners for these events. Oftentimes, running stores partner with both middle and high schools to help young and aspiring runners have access to affordable training and racing shoes. Staffed by runners who are knowledgeable about all the latest shoe models, your local specialty running store plays an invaluable role in promoting healthy lifestyles within their communities.
Have a good understanding of your Running Profile & Style
First, you should to tell the salesperson what you will be doing with your shoes. Specifically, how many miles per week you intend to run and what surface (trails, asphalt, or a treadmill) will you be running? Lastly are you training for a race?
Since a high school or college track runner is different than a middle-aged marathoner, it’s important to take into account your body type. The type of running shoe for a bigger person is typically different than that for a person with a smaller frame.
Next, it’s important to know how you run. Your gait should be observed while on a treadmill. A specialty running store employee will video tape you on the treadmill to determine where your foot first comes in contact with the ground. Is it the outside or inside of the heel? Also, they will look to see if the point of initial contact is mainly through the forefoot (as for many athletes and sprinters). If you’re a forefoot runner, you should be wearing a running shoe which has most of its cushion in front. However, you’ll need a different shoe if you run from heel to toe (you’re a heel striker).
(photos are taken from Runnersworld.com (shoe finder resource))
While at the running store, be sure to identify any injuries you may have developed from running. Common injuries like shin splints, blisters, tendonitis and other common injuries experienced by runners can be caused in part by running in the wrong running shoes for your particular running style, gait, body size, etc.
Understand Your Arch
The shape of your arch may help determine whether you pronate (roll to the inside of the foot), supinate (roll to the outside of the foot) or remain neutral when you run. Again, if you’re not certain what kind of arch you have (it may not be completely flat or high), the experts at the running store can help. They may give you a “wet test” by moistening the bottom of your foot and having you make an imprint on a dark piece of paper to determine your arch type. A good physical therapist or sports medicine doctor should also be able to help you determine your arch type, but I would simply start with the expert at the shoe store unless you had been injured and were seeking a diagnosis.
For 30 years, I didn’t over pronate and never required additional stability in my shoes. I have a fairly normal foot and gait analysis showed normal pronation. However, about 3 years ago, after finishing the Chicago Marathon, I began experiencing ankle and foot pain a month after the race. The pain subsided, but recurred the following Summer when I was training for the Portland Marathon. I thought that the pain was a result of overtraining. However, after my physical therapist completed a gait analysis on a treadmill, he concluded that I was over pronating. I didn’t think that I was a pronator, but in my mid 40s, my running style and body size were different than 25 years before. The cure for my injury wasn’t simply to slow down, I needed orthotics and I needed to improve the stability of my shoes. It took me 2.5 months to become used to orthotics, but now I can’t wear any kind of shoe without inserts. I remained injury free training for my last two marathons in part because I now wear orthotics.
Bottomline, understanding your arch and whether or not you pronate is a part of the information necessary to determine which shoe models you should try. The staff at your running store will also observe your gait analysis, running style, injury history and body profile. These factors will merely help them select a few shoes for you to try. Ultimately, the comfort of the shoe once you put your foot in it will determine what you purchase.
Test your foot 360 degrees inside the shoe
When you are being fitted for running shoes, you need to test more than the toe box. When you stand, your whole foot should fit on the platform of the shoe. Feel all the way around the foot to make sure that all the bones are sitting on the shoe platform. The shoe shouldn’t squeeze the foot. The entire width of the foot should be touching the base of the shoe. It’s really important that you pay attention to shoe width. Shoes don’t just come in different lengths, but also different widths as well. You can buy some shoes in widths, but be aware also that shoe width can vary from brand to brand, and sometimes it varies among models within a brand. I always look for a shoe that fits snug but comfortably through the heel and midfoot. Also, you don’t want your foot to be squeezed excessively, especially in the forefoot.
Shop later in the day
Just like when you run, feet swell during the day. Trying running shoes when your feet are at their largest. This will give you the most comfortable and accurate fit.
Bring your old shoes
When you are shopping for a new pair of running shoes, I always bring my old ones along, This can help the salesperson determine what kind of running shoes you need. One strategy is for the salesperson to look at the way your old shoe is worn in order to confirm your running profile.
It’s actually possible for your feet to change as you age. Every year, get your foot measured to confirm your size. This is the critical first step when seeking a comfortable fit. It’s also possible, that that the size you wore in a Saucony, Nike, Asics or whatever shoe that you’ve been wearing, may not be the size you will wear in a New Balance, Brooks, Adidas or other brand of shoe. The experts at the running store that I support recommend getting a running shoe that’s a half size larger than their street shoes. The extra room allows your foot to flex, swell a little and your toes to move forward with each stride.
Probably more common than change in size, is change in shape of our feet over time. As discussed above, I didn’t pronate much for many years, but my physical therapist pointed out that in my middle age, my foot had probably flattened a bit, which then necessitated not only a change in the type of shoe for more stability, but also the need for orthotics.
How should shoes fit?
Make sure the shoes are comfortable in the store. If they are not, they won’t be comfortable for running. The shoe should feel comfortable as soon as you put it on. Try different shoes if something doesn’t feel right. I’ve never been to a running store where I felt pressured to take one of the first pair of shoes that they offered. Ask if you can go for a short (50 yard) jog in the shoes.
Other Do’s and Don’ts of choosing a new running shoe
- Go shopping for new running in the socks you intend to run. Also bring the shoe inserts or orthotics.
- Never buy a shoe for its looks or because someone raved about it in a running magazine or some online forum. Also, don’t simply seek the lightest or most cushioned shoe. It’s really important to follow the above steps in order to ensure you try the best shoe(s) for your running style and profile.
- Once a salesperson observes your running gait, narrows down the type of runner you are and the type of foot you have, he or she should be able to present several different shoes for you. Take your time trying on and testing shoes. Ensure you run 50+ yards in the shoe and walk around a little before you complete your purchase. Try shoes on both feet and take them for a test run around the shop, on a treadmill or on the sidewalk. Purchase the shoe that feels best when you’re running in it, not just standing.
- Plan on trying about 3-6 pairs of shoes. Try shoes that are in your desired price range, but also some that may be a little more expensive. Don’t buy for price, instead, buy the shoe that feels the best. If you have to spend a little more to ensure that you can run comfortably and remain injury free, then it’s a good investment.
- Be wary of someone pushing insoles. Some stores may try to sell you insoles/inserts with your shoes. Not that these are a bad thing, but you may not need anything else. If it’s your first pair of running shoes, try running without additional insoles / inserts and see how you feel. If you later become injured, a Doctor or physical therapist, either of whom specialize in dealing with runners, may prescribe inserts or some other appropriate solution.
- The Test Drive is the most critical step in this entire process. If there is anything that’s rubbing you wrong or doesn’t feel right, then you shouldn’t purchase that shoe.
- If you’re seeking a specific shoe, a good resource is the Runner’s World Shoe Finder http://www.runnersworld.com/shoe-finder/shoe-advisor
When to buy new shoes
Whenever I buy new shoes, I write the date I start to use them on the inside tongue. Don’t run in shoes longer than six months unless you are rotating shoes, which I recommend. If you can, track your mileage in each shoe and make it a point to look at their condition at 350 miles. I don’t recommend running in shoes that have over 500 miles because shoes at this mileage are worn down and can leave you at a high risk of injury if you continue to run in them.
There is no one best shoe for anyone. There are plenty of quality running shoes that will provide your feet the unique support and fit you require. Go local and plan on trying as many different pairs of running shoes until you feel comfortable. Another great thing about local specialty running stores is that they usually have a 30 day return period. In my experience, if I’m not happy with a shoe for whatever reason, I can take it back to my specialty running store within 30 days and they’ll provide me credit for the original purchase value of the shoe. I don’t think I can get this same return policy from an online retailer.
Final Words of Wisdom….Go Local & Avoid Online Shoe Retailers
You’re unique and especially so are your feet. A high school runner is different than a person in their mid 40s – 50s. Having your gait and foot type analyzed, will help to ensure you get the feel, fit, cushion, and support you require to help ensure you can run injury free. Support the experts at your local specialty running shoe store. They are a vital part of your running community. They are essential in the proper development of young runners and promoting health and fitness in your town.
One way to minimize risk of injury, while maximizing the life of your shoes, is to rotate use of your shoes.
I follow Peter Larson’s Runblogger.com. Although I don’t know Peter, it appears that he’s able to make a living blogging about running. His writing is insightful and well researched. The following story was recently published and makes sense.
For the last 20 years, I have run in the same shoe until it’s time to move on to a fresh pair (typically 450 – 500 miles). I have been fortunate to avoid any “major” injuries. However, because I pronate, I require a stable shoe. Also, I’m somewhat of a heal striker, so I need additional padding.
Currently I have had success with the Asics GT2000. Although this model is no longer produced, I’ve been able purchase 2 new pairs in the last 45 days (on Amazon for $75 and at a local sporting good store for $60). I’m of the opinion that if you’re able to train in a particular shoe or if you have a couple of shoes you wear (a lightweight pair for the track or trail running shoes) that allow you to train for marathons injury free, then stick with that shoe. If you can find a pair on sale, then make the purchase regardless of need. These days shoe manufacturers are so quick to upgrade a shoe and take it’s predecessor off the market so you’re forced to pay $120+.
Peter discusses rotating shoes for different workouts. Please take a look at the following post and let me know what you think.
The concept of rotating shoes is one that I have written about many times, as have others in the running blogosphere. Yesterday I posted about how foot strike changes with running speed, and I touched on the fact that different shoes might thus be appropriate for different workouts. I’ve also written about a study that suggests that rotating shoes might reduce injury risk.
The reality is that a segment of the running community has long recognized the value of rotating shoes for different workouts or to keep the legs fresh. However, there are more than a few runners who would never consider doing so and to whom the concept of a shoe rotation is totally new and a bit scary.
A fair number of the injured runners I see in the clinic do all of their training on roads in a single shoe (or maybe two very similar models from different brands). Often when I bring up the idea of rotating shoes the response is something along the lines of “It’s OK to do that???” Many are receptive to trying something different, but when I tell them it’s ok to mix a new shoe in with their current one on different workouts they seem perplexed.
I’ve long wondered why running shoe companies and retail stores aren’t more vocal about this concept of a shoe rotation. It seems like a win-win (provided the runner can afford multiple pairs of shoes). I’ve asked a few retailers and brand reps about this, and there seems to be some sensitivity about the possibility that a customer might feel they are being pushed to buy something they don’t need. Shoes are expensive after all, and getting more expensive every year.
I was pleased therefore when I came across this post on rotating shoes on the Saucony blog. Sure Saucony is a very biased party here – rotating shoes means selling more shoes, and what shoe company doesn’t want to sell more shoes?
I do think that the article makes good sense, and it’s written by Spencer White, head of the Saucony Lab. Spencer is a good scientist, and I’ve spent a few days with him down at Saucony HQ (he did a full gait analysis on me with their force treadmill and 3D kinematic setup). He and I share a lot of common ground in our thinking about shoes, running form, and injuries, and this paragraph pretty much sums up my own thinking on why rotating shoes makes sense:
“Our bodies are best at doing one thing: Adapting to the environment and the stresses we expose them to. For runners this means that our bodies adapt to the stress of running, becoming fit and strong. But… because running is so repetitive, it can occasionally overstress our bodies, especially when we increase training intensity. Every step loads the same tissues in the same way as the previous step. Running shoes can affect how the stress of running is distributed within the tissues of your body. By wearing different shoes on different days, you may avoid overloading any one muscle, tendon, bone, or ligament while simultaneously strengthening others.”
Spencer goes on to talk about shoes and speed:
“If you run at different speeds on different days, or on different surfaces (if you don’t do this, you should!), you may find that a shoe that feels just right at a training pace feels too mushy for intervals, or that the racing flat that works so well for a track workout just feels jarring when running more slowly on the run home. For many runners, a shoe that compresses more feels like it works better with their stride at slower paces, while a shoe that compresses less feels like it works better with their stride at faster paces.”
Read Spencer’s full post here.
I personally liken running shoes to golf clubs. A golfer would never play 18 holes with just a putter. Golfers have a bag full of clubs that each has an intended purpose. In a similar manner I think some runners would benefit from having a few different shoes to use for different purposes. Find the most comfortable shoe you can find for most of your mileage. Get a flat for days you run a bit faster. A trail shoe to maximize variation by getting yourself off of the road once in awhile. I think that by mixing things up you’ll avoid hammering your body with the same repetitive stress every time you run, and this might reduce your chances of getting hurt.
What do you think, do you find value in rotating shoes?
Introducing Stride Signature – An Individual’s Unique Running Form Defined by the Body’s Habitual Motion Path
At Brooks we strive to create the perfect ride for every stride. As we look to the future, we are focused on improving the complex interaction between the runner and the shoe by widening the lens of our understanding of runner biomechanics.
Four years of prospective research studies on hundreds of runners and work with some of our key specialty retail partners has led us to an exciting breakthrough. A breakthrough that will take us into the next era of how we assess runners and design footwear.
Today we are excited to share the first iteration of research that we believe steers us on a path to shift the current running shoe paradigm further in favor of the runner. We are calling this multi-layered concept Stride Signature. The goal of Stride Signature is to create a new holistic approach to designing and fitting running shoes that starts with the runner to optimize efficiency, reduce injury, and enhance comfort.
We invite you to read The Stride Signature white paper, where we will introduce a radical shift in thinking that will set Brooks on an exciting new trajectory in footwear design for years to come.
One of the big challenges I face in writing this blog is trying to remain objective given that I have personal biases stemming from my own experience. For example, I review, promote, and like running in more minimal shoes and don’t foresee myself ever going back to more traditional models. However, I try hard to resist the urge to convert this personal preference into a general recommendation for all runners. It’s challenging at times, and I sometimes I may project this preference more strongly than I should, but I recognize that other people have had positive experiences running in motion control, and others have had great success running barefoot. Different strokes for different folks, the important thing is finding what works for you.
There are lots of examples of where I see people making general claims relating to running that stem from their own experience, and it’s important to remember that your individual experience is related to the specific circumstances that you face. It may not be generalizable to all. I’ll give some examples.
In response to my post yesterday about the Army study showing no difference in injury rates between traditionally and minimally shod runners I got some comments along the lines of “Going minimal fixed my injuries, this research in bunk!” I have no doubt that many individuals have had great success going minimal and have used it as a tool to overcome long-term injury. That’s great! And these stories are important because they give us some insight into strategies that might work when a runner encounters a particular injury. But, I also know people who have gone minimal, broken their foot, and returned to more cushioned shoes (and yes, I understand that they may have transitioned to quickly, but they might also just be more susceptible to bone damage…). I also have friends who are much faster than me that have run in motion control shoes with success for much of their running career. The point is that, yes, your story is important, but it may not be reflective of the experience of other people out there. People are highly variable – we vary anatomically, physiologically, and our life experiences and circumstances differ. Why would we expect the same solution to work for every person?
Another example I see often comes from the clinical environment. Some clinicians have reported seeing a big uptick of injured minimalist runners showing up in their clinics and thus minimalist running is deemed dangerous. However, I’m sure they also see quite a few injured traditionally shod runners as well. Minimalist running is a relatively new phenomenon (and yes, I know someone will comment that traditionally shod running is what’s really new in the longer span of human history, but it’s the norm in the professional experience of most clinicians practicing right now…). Any time something new appears on the scene you are likely to see an uptick in injuries related to the practice. I’d wager that clinicians have seen an uptick in yoga or crossfit related injuries in recent years as well. Does that make those practices bad or dangerous? (I’m sure I may get some colorful responses to that question!)
The problem for clinicians is that they see people who are injured. If you’re not injured, you don’t go to the doctor or therapist. If you take up minimal running and your knee stops hurting, you no longer show up in the clinic. Docs deal with the bad cases. The importance of studies like the Army study (presuming it gets vetted through peer review and published) is that it suggests that when you look a broader sample of minimal shoe wearers, they tend to not get hurt any more or less than traditionally shod individuals. However, when they do get hurt it may be in new and different ways, which makes sense since tissues are stressed differently when you wear minimal shoes. The importance of clinical experience is that clinicians can give us a sense of which injuries are more common among this new population. They are on the front lines dealing with the wounded. For example, it seems that with minimal running we more frequently see things like metatarsal stress fractures, calcaneal fractures, plantar fascia tears, etc. Clinicians help reveal these patterns, and can help develop strategies to minimize risk and effectively treat the problems when they arise.
I’ll add one more example that is a slight bit different. I was reading through a Facebook conversation the other day in which a comment was made along the lines of “the only way to get faster is to run more.” The implication seemed to be that shoes and form aren’t that big a deal. Someone else responded that this may be true, but that you can only run more if you can do so without getting injured. And, avoiding injury may have a lot to do with managing footwear, mechanics, etc. Even better, I had a guy on Twitter tell me the other night that I was a “hobby jogger minimalist pumper” and that to combat overstriding people need to stop “slow-twitching” themselves to death and start working more on top end speed. I can guess what might happen if I tried having my couch to 5k group running sprints instead of the slow buildup approach we are taking…
The problem here is that it can be hard for people who are in good physical condition and not susceptible to injury to recognize what a battle it is for some to simply be able to run more or run faster. I can use myself and my wife as an example. I’ve been lucky to have not suffered a serious injury in the 6 years that I’ve been a serious runner. I’ve had my share of aches and pains, but nothing that’s required more than just a few days of rest to resolve. I can generally increase my mileage and do speed-work without running into major trouble. And yes, increased mileage makes me capable of running faster races. I can also seemingly run in most any shoe, or even barefoot, without much trouble. I’m lucky like that.
My wife on the other hand has been more or less unable to run regularly for several years. Chronic hip pain and foot pain have been her nemeses (you can read more about her story here). Running more miles is not going to make her faster, it’s going to make her hurt. She’ll break, and won’t be able to run at all. We had to address the underlying mechanical problems, and yes, footwear, to get her right enough to even be able to run a few miles without pain. She’s now able to run 2-3 times per week, 3 miles at a time due to a combo of strengthening exercise prescribed by a doc and Hoka One One Bondi 2shoes prescribed by my friend Nate. The Hokas are the only shoes we have tried that allow her to run without foot pain, and we have tried a lot. As a minimalist, it pained me to discover that an ultra-cushioned shoe was the answer, but having her be able to run is more important to me than validating my personal preferences in footwear.
My wife is now at a point where running more might be possible, and increased speed might result, but it took a heck of a long time to get here. Downplaying the role of biomechanics and footwear because your experience is that they don’t matter much makes little sense.
So, I’ll finish by saying that yes, your opinions and experiences are important, and you should share them. We all learn from hearing about works for others, and it lets us have productive debates. But, be careful in thinking that what you have observed or experienced is broadly generalizable. It may be, it may not be. Sometimes you may just have to swallow you pride and recognize that Hokas will let your wife run without pain. And that makes for a happy household 🙂